|
|
A Pacific OBSIP F
-
2009
-
Robert Gordon Sproul
|
|
|
|
Project Title: |
A Pacific OBSIP Facility |
Project Status: |
Submitted |
|
Principal Investigator: |
Jeffrey M. Babcock, SIO |
Project Institution: |
SIO |
|
Project ID: |
101752 |
Version #: |
1 |
|
Date Submitted: |
9/16/2008 5:56:00 PM |
Created By: |
Jeffrey M. Babcock |
|
Date Last Modified: |
9/16/2008 5:56:00 PM |
URI Serial #: |
None |
|
Funding Agencies: |
NSF/OCE/MGG - 0453971 - Funded |
|
Summary of Field Work: |
equipment testing for SIO Pacific OBSIP Facility |
|
Summary of Facility Requirements: |
|
|
Summary of other requirements and comments: |
equipment testing for SIO Pacific OBSIP Facility |
|
|
Type of Request: |
Primary Ship Use |
Request Status: |
Submitted |
|
Request ID: |
1002442 |
Created By: |
Jeffrey M. Babcock |
|
Date Last Modified: |
9/16/2008 5:56:00 PM |
Date Submitted: |
9/16/2008 5:56:00 PM |
|
|
Year: |
2009
|
Ship/Facility: |
Robert Gordon Sproul
|
|
Optimum Start Date:
|
1/1/2009 |
Dates to Avoid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earliest Start Date: |
1/1/2009 |
Multi-Ship Op: |
No |
|
Latest Start Date: |
1/1/2009 |
Other Ship(s): |
|
|
|
Operating Days Needed: |
Science Days |
Mob Days |
De-Mob Days |
Estimated Transit Days |
Total Days |
|
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
Repeating Cruise?
(within same year) |
No |
Interval: |
|
# of Cruises: |
|
|
|
Description of Repeating cruise requirements: |
Original ship time request for annual ship use toward OBS testing only for the OBSIP pool (an NSF facility) extended until CY 2008. Grant extends until March 2010. This request augments ship time through 2009 and the end of the current OBSIP award. |
Justification/Explanation for ship choice, dates,
conflicts, number of days & multi-ship operations: |
Optimum dates: Variable. OBSIP instrumentation construction and testing is an ongoing project. Flexibility in ship time is crucial, cruise dates are scheduled upon the completion of OBS instrument construction and also to coincide between scheduled OBSIP field programs. Ready access to the Marine Facility and port at SIO is optimal for efficient operations. The R/V Sproul is an ideal platform for multiple, short-term cruises toward instrument testing in local waters. |
|
Short Description of Op Area
for use in schedules: |
|
| Description of Op Area: |
|
| Op Area Size/Dia.: |
|
|
|
| |
Lat/Long |
Marsden Grid |
Navy Op Area |
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
| |
Show Degrees Minutes |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Clearance Required? |
No |
Coastal States:
|
 Important Info on Foreign Research Clearances
|
|
Are you or any member in your science party bringing in any science equipment items which are regulated for export by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and/or the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)?
|
No |
If yes, have you applied for the necessary permits through your export control office?
|
No |
| Questions about ITAR/EAR regulations?
|
Comments about foreign clearance requirements or
description of any other special permitting requirements
(e.g., MMPA, ESA, IHA, Marine Sanctuaries, etc.) |
|
|
|
Requested Start Port |
Intermediate Port(s) |
Requested End Port |
|
San Diego, CA, USA |
San Diego, CA, USA |
San Diego, CA, USA |
Explanation/justification for requested
ports and dates of intermediate stops
or to list additional port stops |
Requested Ports: Start - San Diego/Intermediate - San Diego/End - San Diego |
Important Info on Working in Foreign Ports
|
|
|
|
Chief Scientist: |
Jeffrey M. Babcock, SIO |
|
# in Science Party |
10 |
# of different science teams |
1 |
# Marine Technicians to be
provided by ship operator:
(include in science party total)
|
1 |
|
Explanation of Science Party Requirements and Technician Requirements |
|
|
 Dynamic Positioning | ADCP | Multibeam | Seismic |
| Dredging/Coring/Large Dia. Trawl Wire | Stern A-frame | Fiber Optic (.681) | 0.680 Coax Wire |
| SCUBA Diving | Radioisotope use - briefly describe | NO Radioisotope use/Natural level work | Other Operator Provided Inst. - Describe |
| 0 PI-Provided Vans - briefly describe | MOCNESS | | |
|
Explain Instrumentation or Capability
requirements that could affect choice
of ship in scheduling. |
|
|
|
|
Explain Major Ancillary Facilities
Requirements and list description
and provider for "other" systems. |
|
|
